Comments for ITANA.ORG http://www.itana.org IT Architects in Academia Fri, 22 May 2009 19:27:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on ITANA Screen2Screen: Kuali on Campus by mikezack http://www.itana.org/2009/05/19/itana-screen2screen-kuali-on-campus/comment-page-1/#comment-2407 mikezack Fri, 22 May 2009 19:27:04 +0000 http://www.itana.org/?p=107#comment-2407 Coincidentally <a href="http://www.rsmart.com" rel="nofollow">rSmart</a> is hosting a Kuali Financial System (KFS) 3.0 Introduction this same day, May 28th, at 3 PM EDT / 12 PM PDT. Make it a Kuali day and join us after the ITANA event to learn more about the latest release of KFS. For more info or to register go here: http://bit.ly/s5ngT Thanks, Mike Z. Coincidentally rSmart is hosting a Kuali Financial System (KFS) 3.0 Introduction this same day, May 28th, at 3 PM EDT / 12 PM PDT. Make it a Kuali day and join us after the ITANA event to learn more about the latest release of KFS. For more info or to register go here: http://bit.ly/s5ngT

Thanks,
Mike Z.

]]> Comment on Ron Thielen’s presentation on Enterprise Security Architecture by smwahe http://www.itana.org/2007/01/04/ron-thielens-presentation-on-enterprise-security-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-1338 smwahe Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:08:45 +0000 http://www.itana.org/2007/01/04/ron-thielens-presentation-on-enterprise-security-architecture/#comment-1338 This must have been a good presentation. I think Ron has an important point that there is not a difference between the enterprise architecture versus a specific security architecture. I hope that those of us in security do not come across stating that there is a difference. We do tend to have difficulties in identify were certain security controls should reside in the different parts of the architecture. Any thoughts? I like to think that security is what we do across the enterprise and is not its on block in a stack. I also see that the security architecture diagram from the NAC ESA document was referenced. I am proud of that work but when I show that diagram to people, I receive a glazed over deer in the headlights response. Is there a way to simplify that digram for the higher education environment? This must have been a good presentation. I think Ron has an important point that there is not a difference between the enterprise architecture versus a specific security architecture. I hope that those of us in security do not come across stating that there is a difference. We do tend to have difficulties in identify were certain security controls should reside in the different parts of the architecture. Any thoughts? I like to think that security is what we do across the enterprise and is not its on block in a stack.

I also see that the security architecture diagram from the NAC ESA document was referenced. I am proud of that work but when I show that diagram to people, I receive a glazed over deer in the headlights response. Is there a way to simplify that digram for the higher education environment?

]]> Comment on Welcome to ITANA.ORG – Who, What, Why et al by poepping http://www.itana.org/2006/08/25/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-3 poepping Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:20:11 +0000 #comment-3 What's the plan for meeting? I don't have travel plans to Texas for EduCause? voice/video-con? also, best if you could change "CMU" to "Carnegie Mellon"... you know... What’s the plan for meeting? I don’t have travel plans to Texas for EduCause? voice/video-con? also, best if you could change “CMU” to “Carnegie Mellon”… you know…

]]> Comment on Welcome to ITANA.ORG – Who, What, Why et al by Dave Packham http://www.itana.org/2006/08/25/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Dave Packham Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:43:50 +0000 #comment-2 Im in. let me know which educause we are going to start with and ill get travel plans rolling. Dave P Im in. let me know which educause we are going to start with and ill get travel plans rolling.

Dave P

]]>